Skip to main content

There’s merit in reticence

Hiranmaey Karlekar

Pakistan must do more to prove its commitment The statement by Pakistan’s Interior Minister, Mr Rehman Malik, at a news conference last Thursday that perpetrators of the sea-borne attack on Mumbai on November 26, 2008, could have been from Pakistan, marked a shift from Islamabad’s familiar tactics of denials, prevarications and attempted deflections; so did his remark that “some part of the conspiracy” had been hatched in Islamabad. He also said that Pakistan had registered a case against nine suspects on the charges of abetting, conspiring at and facilitating a terrorist act, and that six of them, including Lashkar-e-Tayyeba leaders Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi and Zarar Shah, named by India as masterminds of the attack, were already in custody. Reacting to Pakistan’s admission, External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee stated in Parliament last Friday that “much depends on actions in the Mumbai case reaching their logical conclusion”. While describing the development as positive, he pointed out that it came after the fourth official communication by India, and that, until then, Islamabad had resorted to prevarication and denial and displayed a misplaced sense of victimhood.Many have felt that Mr Mukherjee could have been a little more welcoming, as could Union Home Minister P Chidambaram, who, while stating that his initial response was that it was a positive development, had emphasised that the Indian dossier presented to Pakistan was so tightly and cogently argued that “nobody could have ignored it”.The fact is that the reserve with which they responded was warranted. Islamabad has only registered a case; nobody has yet been convicted or punished. Besides, as Mr Malik pointed out at the news conference, it had given India 30 questions, asking for information ranging from the fingerprints of the 10 terrorists, the surviving terrorist Ajmal Amir Kasab’s DNA, and details of telephone conversations between the terrorists and their handlers, and of some bank transfers.Pakistan may well let things drag and then turn around and say that India’s answers had not been satisfactory. Its past actions — such as the offer to send the ISI chief, Lt Gen Shuja Pasha, to India in the immediate aftermath of the Mumbai attack and then do an about-turn — hardly inspires confidence. Nor can one ignore the fact that Mr Malik’s announcement came the day after US President Barack Obama’s telephone conversation with Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari and the last day of the US special representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Mr Richard Holbrooke’s four-day visit to Islamabad. Clearly, American pressure had been a major factor and inputs by the FBI had played a critical role. The FBI provided the information that led to the arrest of Javed Iqbal, who, according to Mr Malik, was a key player in the conspiracy and who was ‘lured’ back to Pakistan from Spain. The FBI, again, reportedly deciphered the data from the GPS equipment used by the terrorists and traced the path — shown in the Indian dossier — not only to Karachi but addresses in the city at which the GPS device was on, and perhaps also to the arrest of Hamad Amin Sadiq, who, according to Mr Malik, was the mastermind.While all this is a welcome indication of the improvement in India-US relations that has occurred in the recent years and a clear example of the benefits that international cooperation in combating terrorism can yield, it also shows how dependent India is on American support and help. Such dependence can produce results as long as India-US ties remain cordial and the US retains both its power and the will and ability to defeat Islamist terrorism in what is going to be a savage and prolonged conflict.Unfortunately, the economic crisis that has hit the US puts a question mark on its ability to wage a war of this kind. Second, its withdrawal from Vietnam shows that its political will cannot be indefinitely taken for granted. Elements favouring the Taliban and Pakistan in the CIA and the State Department may get active once the body bags begin to arrive in larger numbers. A US retreat from Afghanistan will leave India facing a resurgent Taliban-Al Qaeda-ISI axis sworn to its destruction. To be on the safe side, it should begin preparing for such a contingency from now. (The Pioneer)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

KCP(MC) is the proxy of security forces, say KYKL and UNLF

IMPHAL, May 30: The KYKL and the UNLF, in a joint communique to the press condemned the bomb explosion at the RIMS within the office complex of the institute`s director, Dr. Fimate, calling it an act of terrorism calculated to tarnish the image of the revolutionary movement in the state.The joint statement said, intimidating the sick and ailing is an unforgivable act of inhumanity, adding that under humanitarian norms hospitals are spared even during the most bitter wars.The two underground organisations said the pattern of these assaults by the KCP(MC) should have made it clear to everybody by now that the KCP(MC) is the masked proxy of the Indian forces with an agenda to alienate the revolutionary campaign waged by revolutionary organisations from the people.It however said this campaign by the "Indian Occupational Forces" would boomerang on it sooner than later.Explaining further, the two outlawed groups said the KCP(MC) is now holed up within the IG (AR) South headquarte

KYKL clarifies on killing of Prof Islamuddin

IMPHAL, May 30: The underground KYKL in a lengthy clarification on the matter of its killing Prof. Islamuddin of the Manipur University, said it understands the outrage of the public in the killing of a teacher, but is saddened by the response of Meitei Pangal organisations that the KYKL had targeted a Meitei Pangal deliberately. It said this was far from the truth and that the KYKL treats Meitei Pangals, Meitei Chistians, Meitei Buddists, Meitei Hindus, Meitei Athiests as belonging to one Meitei community, and this is very much enshrined in its constitution. It said Prof. Islamuddin was killed not because of his ethnicity or community but because he was part of a corrupt clique which was usurping all powers of the Manipur University in order to convert the university into their private fiefdom. It said the KYKL has Meitei Pangal cadres in it and the Meitei Pangal community would realise the party is never against this fraternal community at all in time. It said the MU clique had to be

Overgrounds’ pre-requisite

By Oken Jeet Sandham The recent stepped-up abductions, factional clashes and killings among the Naga underground factions have not only greatly disturbed the relative peace but also threatened the peace process. For quite some time, the NSCN (IM) and Unification Group have been trading charges each other for the prevailing insecure environment particularly in and around Dimapur area. One should not forget that both NSCN (IM) and NSCN (K) are currently in truce with the Government of India. In the past too, there have been allegations of violation of Cease Fire Ground Rules (CFGRs) by cadres of both NSCN (IM) and the NSCN (K), while the leaders of both the factions also cast aspersions to the Indian Security Forces for having violated CFGRs. Both factions also accused the Indian Security Forces of working hand in glove with either side. On many occasions, the grey areas in the CFGRs have been highlighted. Even the chairman of the ministerial team of the government of India for political